Lindsay Clancy Jury Note Reveals Trouble Behind Deadlock

On Day 6 of jury deliberations in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court, the jury still could not return a verdict. However, on Thursday, the reason for the delay became clearer.

A Note From The Jury Foreperson

According to the BBC, a note sent by the jury foreperson to Judge William Sullivan claimed that one juror was ignoring the instructions given regarding reasonable doubt.

Lindsay Clancy does not deny killing her three children in 2023, so the jurors are not deciding that point. However, she pleaded not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, with her defence arguing that she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis.

A Standoff

The note revealed problems within the jury as they deliberated. According to the Associated Press, it suggested that at least one juror was not adhering to the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt.

The outlet noted, “Details of the jury room conflict weren’t revealed by the judge and only briefly discussed in open court, but they raised the possibility that a single holdout was standing in the way of a verdict.”

Reddington Wanted The Juror Removed

Reasonable doubt is critical in any criminal trial, and it is up to the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt rather than the defence having to prove that Lindsay Clancy is innocent.

That explains why Clancy’s legal representative, Kevin Reddington, demanded that the juror be removed from the case.

The Boston Herald cited Reddington as saying in open court on Thursday, “My motion is to remove the juror.”

Multiple outlets reported that Judge Sullivan declined to remove the juror. Instead, he questioned each juror individually and reminded them of the reasonable doubt requirement. He then sent them back for further deliberations.

Edging Towards A Mistrial

After court ended for the day, Reddington spoke to reporters about why he wanted the juror removed. He said, “I don’t want a mistrial,” adding, “It’s basically that there’s a person who has doubt but will not listen to the judge’s instruction.”

NBC News reported that the case seems perilously close to a mistrial. That’s because all the jurors must reach a unanimous verdict. It is now apparent that one juror is at odds with the other 11, and if they cannot agree, a mistrial could be declared.

Why Does The Juror Matter To The Defense?

During the outlet’s YouTube coverage, reporter Emilie Ikeda was asked, “How difficult is it to remove a juror?”

She explained, “Legal experts say the process itself isn’t that difficult, with six alternates. But the judge has to be very careful not to even appear to put his thumb on the scale.”

Why would the defence want another juror? Well, apart from not wanting a mistrial, Reddington’s request appears to suggest that the lone juror is standing in the way of the outcome sought by the defence.

However, the judge has not revealed which way either side of the apparent 11-to-1 split is leaning.

Your thoughts? Join the discussion and then come back for more true crime news and updates. We also have a crime channel on TikTok that you can follow.