Palisades Fire Suspect Jonathan Rinderknecht Faces Fewer Charges After Mistrial

A superseding indictment was filed against Jonathan Rinderknecht, who is accused of starting the 2025 Palisades Fire. This time, he faces two counts instead of three. It came after his first trial ended in a mistrial.

Rinderknecht denies intentionally starting the Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed more than 6,800 buildings.

Jurors Could Not Agree In The First Trial

The new, scaled-back indictment follows a 10-2 jury split in favour of acquittal.

With the first trial ending in a mistrial, it is not clear how prosecutors intend to prove their case this time around.

Fewer Charges

According to the Associated Press, “All three charges in the first trial blamed Rinderknecht for setting both the Jan. 1 fire and the Palisades Fire.”

The article also noted, “In the new indictment, only one charge references both fires. The other only focuses on the destruction caused by the first fire.”

Prosecution Evidence

NBCLA reported on YouTube that it is not clear how the prosecution might approach the new trial with regard to the existing evidence.

The reporter also explained that count one now focuses only on the Lachman Fire, which prosecutors did not want to refer to by name during the first trial.

The outlet also noted that prosecutors previously presented the two fires as one event. But now, the second count will focus on the damage and destruction caused by the Palisades Fire.

The Original Trial

As a reminder, prosecutors alleged that Jonathan Rinderknecht used a barbecue lighter to start a small fire on New Year’s Day 2025.

Their case was that the original fire did not die out but smouldered for days before breaking out again when heavy Santa Ana winds arrived, causing the Palisades Fire.

The Defense Reacted

Jonathan Rinderknecht’s legal team argued that firefighters might not have fully extinguished the original New Year’s Day blaze and that remaining hotspots could have started the Palisades Fire.

They also argued that fireworks might have caused the original fire.

Two residents and a security guard reported seeing flashes or hearing what sounded like fireworks. Two witnesses also reported seeing a group of teenagers running down the trail.

The status conference is scheduled for Wednesday, August 19. The Justice Department currently lists the retrial for October 19, 2026.

Reactions To The News

Considering how devastating the Palisades fire was, there were surprisingly few people commenting in the update. But one person suggested, “Of course he’s guilty – just hard to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Bring on the civil suits.”

Another viewer seemed a bit confused, saying, “Wait, so I don’t get it. Is the defense saying that he didn’t do it, or is the defense saying he didn’t do certain ones? Are we not even sure we have the right guy?”

Your thoughts? Join the discussion and then come back for more true crime news and updates. We also have a crime channel on TikTok that you can follow.