Government Considers Removing Prince Andrew From Line of Succession
- 0Facebook
- 0Twitter
- 0Pinterest
- 0LinkedIn
- Total0
The British government is now actively exploring legislation that could permanently remove Prince Andrew from the line of succession — a move that would formally ensure he can never ascend to the throne.
The development marks one of the most serious constitutional considerations involving a senior royal in modern history.
Defence Minister Luke Pollard confirmed that discussions between the government and Buckingham Palace are already underway.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Any Questions, Pollard said ministers had “absolutely” been working with the Palace to prevent Andrew from “potentially being a heartbeat away from the throne.”
He described the proposal as “the right thing to do,” though he emphasized that any legislative action should follow the conclusion of the ongoing police investigation.
Andrew, the King’s younger brother, currently remains eighth in line to the throne despite being stripped of his royal titles — including the use of “Prince” — last October amid renewed scrutiny over his past association with convicted paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. He has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing.
Arrest, Release and Expanding Police Activity
On Thursday evening, Andrew was released under investigation 11 hours after his arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office.
Thames Valley Police continue to examine evidence, with searches at Royal Lodge — Andrew’s long-time 30-room Windsor residence — expected to continue through Monday.
Unmarked police vehicles were again seen entering the estate over the weekend. At one stage, more than 20 vehicles were parked on the property, although it remains unclear how many were directly connected to the investigation.
There are indications the matter could widen further. Several other UK police forces are reportedly considering whether to launch separate inquiries.
Danny Shaw, a former adviser to ex-home secretary Yvette Cooper, warned on Radio 4’s Today programme that “It has the danger of spiralling out of control.” He added that such investigations could take “considerable time.”
The legal process, ministers stress, must be allowed to unfold without political interference.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury James Murray noted that “any questions in that sphere would be quite complicated,” adding that the live police investigation needs to “play out.”
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch echoed that sentiment, stating that “all of us in public life need to give space” to the police investigation to be carried out.
Political Support — But Not Universal Agreement
Momentum for legislative action has grown in Westminster.
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said police should be “allowed to get on with their job, acting without fear or favour.”
He added: “But clearly this is an issue that Parliament is going to have to consider when the time is right, naturally the monarchy will want to make sure he can never become King.”
The SNP’s Westminster leader Stephen Flynn has indicated his party would support removing Andrew from the line of succession if legislation is introduced.
Labour MP Rachael Maskell also backed the proposal, saying: “I would support legislation to remove Andrew from the line of succession and to remove from the counsellor of state.”
However, not all Labour MPs are convinced new legislation is necessary, arguing that Andrew’s position — eighth in line — already makes it highly improbable he would ever approach the throne.
Downing Street had previously said in October that there were no plans to alter succession laws. The current shift in tone reflects the seriousness of recent developments.
Constitutional Hurdles and Historical Precedent
Removing a royal from the line of succession is not a symbolic act — it requires a full Act of Parliament.
Both the House of Commons and House of Lords would need to approve the measure before it receives royal assent from King Charles III.
Beyond the UK, any change would also require agreement from the 14 Commonwealth realms where the monarch serves as head of state, including Canada, Australia, Jamaica and New Zealand.
The most recent alteration to succession rules came in 2013 through the Succession to the Crown Act.
That reform restored individuals previously excluded for marrying Catholics and ended male primogeniture, ensuring that a younger son can no longer displace an elder daughter born after 28 October 2011.
The last time someone was removed from the line of succession entirely was in 1936, when Edward VIII and his descendants were excluded following his abdication.
Drawing a Line Between Crisis and Crown
Behind the constitutional debate lies a broader concern: protecting the monarchy’s institutional stability.
Historian David Olusoga told BBC Newsnight there is now “a desperate desire within government and within the palace to draw a firewall… between this crisis and the wider monarchy.”
Julian Payne, the King’s former communications secretary, suggested the Royal Family is already operating with that distinction in mind.
“They’re very clear: this is an individual. It is not a member of the Royal Family,” Payne told BBC Breakfast. “And they treat the two very, very differently.”
He added that Queen Camilla, having spent much of her life outside royal circles before marriage, is “very adept at tuning into the public mood” and will be closely advising the King as decisions are considered.
The Counsellor of State Question
If Parliament proceeds with legislation to remove Andrew from the line of succession, it would also affect his status as a Counsellor of State — a role that allows senior royals to stand in for the monarch when required.
According to the House of Commons Library, removal from the line would automatically strip him of that function as well. In practice, only working royals are expected to perform those duties.
Andrew stepped back from public life in 2019 following intense backlash over his BBC Newsnight interview about his relationship with Epstein.
Buckingham Palace has so far declined to comment publicly on the government’s reported plans.
Be sure to catch up on everything happening with Prince Andrew now. Come back here often for all Prince Andrew spoilers, news, and updates.

Comments are closed.